A Rare Case of Chondromyxoid Fibroma of Calcaneum: A Case Report

/0 Comments/in /by

Vol. 11 | Issue 1 | January-February 2023 | Page: 27-29 | Shekar Mudramaiah, Pavith Janardhan T, Ajay Krishna

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.062

Authors: Shekar Mudramaiah [1], Pavith Janardhan T [1], Ajay Krishna [1]

[1] Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Pavith Janardhan T
Fellow in Arthroplasty, Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: pavithjanardhan2301@gmail.com

Abstract

Chondromyxoid fibroma is a rare benign Primary tumour occurring in the calcaneum. We report a case of a 23-year-old woman with 3 months history of sudden onset right heel pain with no history of trauma. Which was exacerbated by movement such as walking and standing. A radiographic examination of the right foot and ankle revealed a lesion in the posterior part of the calcaneum. The calcaneum was further evaluated using an MRI scan which revealed a lytic lesion with clearly defined borders. The lesion was treated with curettage, iliac bone grafting, and cementing. Three months after surgery, the graft was consolidated with bone cement in place. There was no sign of recurrence at the one-year follow-up, and the patient had adequate ankle range of motion. Even though the tumour is rare, there is a need for physicians to recognize its radiological features and offer appropriate treatment options.
Keywords: Chondromyxoid fibroma, Lytic lesion, Benign primary tumour

References

1. Dorfman HD, Czerniak B. Bone tumors. Missouri: Mosby; 1998. p. 321–31
2. Wu CT, Inwards CY, O’Laughlin S, et al. Chondromyxoid fibroma of bone: a clinicopathologic review of 278 cases. Hum Pathol 1998;29(5):438-46
3. Robert K, Heck. Benign/aggressive tumors of bone. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. Canale ST, Beatty JH (editors): Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia. 2013; 1: 894
4. Jaffe HL, Lichtenstein L. Chondromyxoid fibroma of bone; a distinctive benign tumor likely to be mistaken especially for chondrosarcoma. Arch Pathol (Chic). 1948; 541-551.
5. Dürr H R, Lienemann A, Nerlich A, Stumpenhausen B, Refior HJ: Chondromyxoid fibroma of bone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000; 120(1-2):42-7
6. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Dallouei SR. Chondromyxoid fibroma of the calcaneus. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2007; 97: 223-224.
7. Oommen AT, Madhuri V, Walter NM. Benign tumors and tumor-like lesions of the calcaneum: a study of 12 cases. Indian J Cancer. 2009; 46: 234-236.
8. Wilson AJ, Kyriakos M, Ackerman LV. Chondromyxoid fibroma: radiographic appearance in 38 cases and in a review of the literature. Radiology. 1991; 179: 513-518.
9. Damle RP, Suryawanshi KH, Dravid NV, et al. Chondromyxoid fibroma of bone. JCR. 2013; 3: 228-231.
10. Zillmer DA, Dorfman HD. Chondromyxoid fibroma of bone: thirty-six cases with clinicopathologic correlation. Hum Pathol. 1989; 20: 952-964.
11. Chondromyxoid fibroma of the calcaneus: a case report and literature review. Azami MA, Lahbali O, El alami I, et al. SM J Orthop. 2017;3:1047.
12. Chondromyxoid fibroma of the calcaneus: two case reports and literature review. Roberts EJ, Meier MJ, Hild G, Masadeh S, Hardy M, Bakotic BW. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52:643–649.

How to Cite this article: Mudramaiah S, Janardhan JT, Krishna A A Rare | Case of Chondromyxoid Fibroma of Calcaneum: A Case Report | Journal of Karnataka Orthopaedic Association | January-February 2023; 11(1): 27-29 | https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.062

 

                                          (Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)

Editorial

/0 Comments/in /by

Vol. 11 | Issue 1 | January-February 2023 | Page: 04 | Anil K. Bhat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.056

Authors: Anil K. Bhat [1]

[1] Department of Hand Surgery, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Anil K. Bhat,
Associate Dean, Professor and Head Department of Hand Surgery, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: jkoa.editor@gmail.com

Editorial

Warm wishes for the New Year and greetings from the editorial board. It is our great pleasure to showcase our issue of the Journal of Karnataka Orthopaedic Association which is being released during the 47th annual conference of the Karnataka Orthopaedic Association. This issue has articles related to technologies in total knee arthroplasties, proximal tibial fractures and very interesting case reports related to 3D printing, supercutaneous plating technique and rare case reports of PIN syndrome and calcaneal tumor.
I must admit that the issue has been brought out with great difficulty due to paucity of submissions. However, the efforts of the executive committee of KOA and many KOA members have resulted in submission of many of these articles. The editorial team has worked very hard to put the issue in place in its present form. We would also like to thank our peer reviewers for their prompt and timely reports and suggestions.
I urge our KOA members to also have a look at the previous issue of JKOA which is available online, the content of which has a very interesting review article on the management of Complex regional pain syndrome and also an unique approach to the hip joint.
As we go through the process of indexing our journal as per the NMC requirements, I request and urge our members to support us in these crucial times by regularly submitting articles which will be always remembered by our future generations. Our Journal of KOA would definitely attain the best of indexing and academic repute in the near future.

Sincerely
Dr. Anil K. Bhat
Editor in Chief, JKOA
Associate Dean, Professor and Head
Department of Hand surgery,
Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, MAHE.

How to Cite this article: Bhat AK | Editorial | Journal of Karnataka Orthopaedic Association| January-February 2023; 11(1): 04. https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.056

 

                                          (Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)

Supercutaneous Plating Technique: A Case Report of Locking Plate Used as an External Fixator

/0 Comments/in /by

Vol. 11 | Issue 1 | January-February 2023 | Page: 23-26 | Shashiraj K Shetty, Edward L Nazareth, Nirath S Hegde, Ajay Kumar, Shushruth M Devanna

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.061

Authors: Shashiraj K Shetty [1], Edward L Nazareth [1], Nirath S Hegde [1], Ajay Kumar [1], Shushruth M Devanna [1]

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Srinivas Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mukka, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Nirath S Hegde
Department of Orthopaedics, Srinivas Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mukka, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: srinivascherkady@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Open fracture is one of the most common and challenging healthcare problem in orthopedic practice1.Despite improvements in implant design, management of open fractures remain a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Locked compression plates (LCP) have advantages of angular stability from the locking-head mechanism and less irritation when compared with traditional external fixators due to their low profiles. Here is a case report of the same.
Case Report: A 50-year-old lady, a municipal worker by occupation, came to casualty with alleged history of road traffic accident and injury to right thigh and knee. Plain radiograph of of right femur with knee revealed a supracondylar fracture of right femur.
As a definitive treatment, patient underwent open reduction and supercutaneous plating. Skin grafting was done for the external wound over distal thigh. The External fixation plate for right distal knee was removed after 6 weeks and knee ROM of 0 to 100 degree flexion was achieved by one year.
Conclusion: Open fractures can be treated by external fixation using the LCP plates, which are safe, reliable and have acceptable functional outcomes with minimal complication rates. Its advantages also include ease of performing surgery and ease of removing plate after fracture healing.
Keywords: Supercutaneous plating, LCP- locking compression plate, External fixator

References

1. M griffin, M Malahias, S Hindocha, and W khan Update on the management of compound lower limb fractures
2. Kloen P. Supercutaneous plating: use of a locking compression plate as an external fixator. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2009 Jan 1;23(1):72-5.
3. Kerkhoffs GM, Kloen P, van der Werken C, et al. Supercutaneous plate fixation. Alternative use of the dynamic compression plate as an external fixator.TechnOrthop. 2004;18:338–343.
4. Hopf T, Osthege S. Interfragmental compression of the Zespol osteosynthesis system. Experimental biomechanical studies. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1987; 125(5):546-52.
5. C Xiao, F Tang, Y Zhou, et al. A locking compression plate as an external fixator for treating infected nonunion of the humeral diaphysis. BMC Surg. 2016; 16:53.
6. Ramotowski W, Granowski R Zespol: Anoriginal method of stable osteosynthesis.ClinOrthopRelat Res 1991;272: 67-75
7. Ching-HouMaa, Chin-HsienWua, Yuan-Kun Tu , Ting-Sheng Lin -Metaphyseal locking plate as a definitive external fixator for treating open tibial fractures—Clinical outcome and a finite element study: Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 2013;44:1097–1101.Source of Support:NilConflict of Interest: Nil
8. Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS et al. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability J Injury. 2007; 38:358-64.
9. Ang BF, Chen JY, Yew AK, Chua SK, Chou SM, Chia SL, Koh JS, Howe TS. Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness.Bone & joint research. 2017 Apr;6(4):216-23.
10. Marti RK, Van der Werken C. The AO-plate for external fixation in cases.ActaOrthop Scand. 1991;62:60–62.
11. Panda SS, Panda D, Suri N. Supracutaneous plating: Use of locking compression plate as external fixator for intra-articular compound fractures. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences. 2016;5(8):62-7.
12. J. B. Giles, J. C. DeLee, J. D. Heckman, and J. E. Keever, “Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur treated with a supracondylar plate and lag screw,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 864–870,1982.

How to Cite this article: Shetty SK, Nazareth EL, Hegde NS, Kumar A, Devanna SM | Supercutaneous Plating Technique: A Case Report of Locking Plate Used as an External Fixator | Journal of Karnataka Orthopaedic Association | January-February 2023; 11(1): 23-26 | https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.061

 

                                          (Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)

A Case Report of Posterior Interrosseous Nerve Syndrome Due to Intermuscular Lipoma

/0 Comments/in /by

Vol. 11 | Issue 1 | January-February 2023 | Page: 20-22 | Nirath S Hegde, Edward L Nazareth, Shashiraj K Shetty, Shashank S

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.060

Authors: Nirath S Hegde [1], Edward L Nazareth [1], Shashiraj K Shetty [1], Shashank S [1]

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Srinivas Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mukka, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Nirath S Hegde
Department of Orthopaedics, Srinivas Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mukka, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: srinivascherkady@gmail.com

 

Abstract

Posterior interosseous nerve compressions are rare. The compression of the posterior interosseous nerve can happen either before, or through or after the course of the nerve in the supinator muscle. Tumors could rarely lead to secondary compression of the nerve by mass effect. We describe a case of a lady aged 73 years with a posterior interosseous nerve syndrome due to an intermuscular lipoma. The patient had appreciable recovery after surgery and physiotherapy.
Keywords: Intermuscular lipoma, Posterior interosseous nerve, Compression.

References

1. Avram R, Hynes NM: Posterior interosseous nerve compression secondary to a parosteal lipoma: Case report and literature review. Can J PlastSurg 12:69–72, 2004.
2. Borman P, Tuncay F, Ulusoy G, Koçer U: Posterior interosseous nerve syndrome due to lipoma. NeurophysiolClin 40:189–191, 2010.
3. El Hyaoui H, Hassoun J, Garch A, Kassimi H, El Fatimi A: Compression of the posterior interosseous nerve by a deep lipoma. Joint Bone Spine 81:265, 2014.
4. Ishikawa H, Hirohata K (1990) Posterior interosseous nerve syndrome associated with rheumatoid synovial cysts of the elbowjoint. ClinOrthopRelat Res 254:134–139.
5. Bowen TL, Stone KH (1966) Posterior interosseous nerve paralysis caused by a ganglion at the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Br48:774–776.
6. Valer A, Carrera L, Ramirez G (1993) Myxoma causing paralysisof the posterior interosseous nerve. ActaOrthopBelg 59:423–425.
7. Taniguchi Y, Yoshida M, Tamaki T (1999) Posterior interosseousnerve syndrome due to pseudogout. J Hand Surg Br 24:125–127.
8. De Smet L (2005) Posterior interosseous neuropathy due to compression by a soft tissue chondroma of the elbow. Actaneurol Belg105:86–88.
9. Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL, Hudson AR, Hunter DA: Chronic nerve compression—an experimental model in the rat. Ann PlastSurg 13:112–120, 1984.
10. Werner CO. Paralysis of the posterior interosseous nerve caused by tumour: brief report. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. 1987 Aug;69(4):670-1.
11. Berry JB, Richard MH (1973) Parosteal lipoma producing paralysis of the deep radial nerve. South Med J 66:1298–1300.

How to Cite this article: Hegde NS, Nazareth EL, Shetty SK, Shashank S | A Case Report of Posterior Interrosseous Nerve Syndrome Due to Intermuscular Lipoma | Journal of Karnataka Orthopaedic Association| January-February 2023; 11(1): 20-22 | https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.060

 

                                          (Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)

THR Using a 3D Printed Custom Made Acetabulum Component: A Case Report

/0 Comments/in /by

Vol. 11 | Issue 1 | January-February 2023 | Page: 17-19 | Lakshith B R, Adarsh U Tuppad, Shashiraj K Shetty, Edward L Nazareth, Kumar Mihir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.059

Authors: Avinash P [1], Karthik Sangani [1], Pavith Janardhan T [1], Prajwal KN [1], Ajay Krishna, Prajwal K [1]

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Karthkik Sangani
Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: mrbonesthehealer@gmail.com

 

Abstract

Introduction: THR is one of the commonly performed adult arthroplasties in the world. Over the past 6 decades, Charnley low friction arthroplasty has evolved in design and concept. One among those recent advances is the use of 3D printing technology in arthroplasties. Purpose of this article is to discuss and share the details of a hip arthroplasty case where a customized 3D printed acetabulum component was used.

Case: A 3 year postop case of acetabulum fracture fixation presented with arthritis of hip. CT revealed a periacetabular massive bone loss. After considering all options, decision was made to use a 3D printed acetabulum shell.

Discussion: Complex THRs with special instrumentation and augmented implants are frequently seen in revision surgeries and post acetabulum fracture cases. Based on the size and pattern of the defect, IlioIschial cages, Triflange cups, Trabecular metal augments, CupCage constructs, Jumbo cups are some common options at a surgeons disposal while tackling an acetabulum bone loss challenge. A 3D manufactured component can be of aid when the defect is too large. It gives the advantage of being anatomically contoured. It also allows a porous structure for bone ingrowth.

Conclusion: Life size models of the pelvis and the component gives an explicit simulation of the surgery, including the component placement and trajectory of the screws. This effective preoperative planning can improve the surgical precision and reduce the complications. Literature on the survival rates and long term complications of such 3d printed acetabulum shells is limited. Studies on the long term outcomes with usage of these implants would be insightful
Keywords: 3D Printing, Complex THR, Customised acetabular shell

References

1. Madhu R et al. Outcome of surgery for reconstruction of fractures of the acetabulum—the time-dependent effect of delay. J Bone Joint Surg.2006; 86B:1197–1203.
2. Giannoudis P.Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br.2005; 87(1):2–9.
3. Telleria JJM, Gee AO. Classifications In Brief: Paprosky Classification of Acetabular Bone Loss. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health); 2013; 471: 3725–30.
4. Sing S et al. Laser and electron-beam powder-bed additive manufacturing of metallic implants: A review on processes, materials and designs. J. Orthop. Res. 2016; 34:369–385.
5. Restrepo S, Smith EB, Hozack WJ. Excellent mid-term follow-up for a new 3D-printed cementless total knee arthroplasty [Internet]. The Bone & Joint Journal. British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2021; 103B:32–7.

How to Cite this article: Avinash P, Sangani K, Pavith JT, Prajwal KN, Krishna A, Prajwal K | THR Using a 3D Printed Custom Made Acetabulum Component: A Case Report | Journal of Karnataka Orthopaedic Association | January-February 2023; 11(1): 17-19 | https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.059

 

                                          (Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)

Soft Tissue Injuries Associated with Proximal Tibia Fractures

/0 Comments/in /by

Vol. 11 | Issue 1 | January-February 2023 | Page: 13-16 | Lakshith B R, Adarsh U Tuppad, Shashiraj K Shetty, Edward L Nazareth, Kumar Mihir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.058

Authors: Lakshith B R [1], Adarsh U Tuppad [1], Shashiraj K Shetty [1], Edward L Nazareth [1], Kumar Mihir [1]

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Srinivas Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mukka, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Lakshith B R
Junior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Srinivas Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mukka, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: lakshithgowdajo3014@gmail.com

 

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to document the pattern of ligament and meniscal injuries that occur with proximal tibia fractures due to high energy trauma. Seventy patients with fractures of proximal tibia due to high-energy mechanisms were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee. All studies were reported by a single musculoskeletal radiologist who was blinded to surgical and physical findings. Of the 70 patients, there were 42 patients with AO/OTA type 41B2 (60%) fractures. On average, 70 % sustained a complete tear or avulsion of one or both cruciates.70% sustained collateral ligament injury.91% had lateral meniscal pathology.40% had medial meniscus tears. Of the 70 patients, 42 patients (60%) had Schatzker type II injuries, in which 90% had lateral meniscus tear, 80% MCL and ACL tear, 66% PCL and LCL tear. We adopted chi-square test to find the association. In our study, we found that there is a significant association between footprint avulsion of PCL and lateral meniscus (p value-0.038), between partial tear of LCL and lateral meniscus (p value-0.048), between partial tear of ACL and medial meniscus (p value-0.023). Also there is a significant association between complete tear of ACL and medial meniscus (p value- 0.019), between partial tear of PCL and medial meniscus (p value-0.007). But there is no significant association between ACL, PCL, MCL, LCL and Schatzker type (p value >0.05). We conclude MRI scanning should be considered for proximal tibia fractures due to high energy mechanism, which would help to identify and treat of associated soft tissue injuries.
Keywords: Soft tissue injury, Proximal tibia fracture, Magnetic resonance imaging, ACL, PCL, LCL, MCL, Medial meniscus and lateral meniscus.

References

1. Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D. The tibial plateau fracture. The Toronto experience 1968–1975. Clin Orthop.
2. Blokker CP, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Tibial plateau fractures. An analysis of the results of treatment in 60 patients. Clin Orthop. 1984:193– 199
3. Vangsness CT Jr, Ghaderi B, Hohl M, et al. Arthroscopy of meniscal injuries with tibial plateau fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:488– 490
4. Bennett WF, Browner B. Tibial plateau fractures: a study of associated soft tissue injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8:183–188.
5. Colletti P, Greenberg H, Terk MR. MR findings in patients with acute tibial plateau fractures. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1996;20:389–394.
6. Kode L, Lieberman JM, Motta AO, et al. Evaluation of tibial plateau fractures: efficacy of MR imaging compared with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:141–147
7. Delamarter RB, Hohl M, Hopp E Jr. Ligament injuries associated with tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop. 1990:226–233.
8. Moore TM, Meyers MH, Harvey JP Jr. Collateral ligament laxity of the knee. Long-term comparison between plateau fractures and normal.
9. Barrow BA, Fajman WA, Parker LM, et al. Tibial plateau fractures: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiographics. 1994;14:553–559.
10. Holt MD, Williams LA, Dent CM. MRI in the management of tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 1995;26:595–599.

How to Cite this article:  Lakshith BR, Tuppad AU, Shetty SK, Nazareth EL, Mihir K | Soft Tissue Injuries Associated with Proximal Tibia Fractures | Journal of Karnataka Orthopaedic Association | January-February 2023; 11(1): 13-16 | https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.058

 

                                          (Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)

Technologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty

/0 Comments/in /by

Vol. 11 | Issue 1 | January-February 2023 | Page: 05-12 | Ravikumar Mukartihal, Rajdeep Das, Chandan S, Vikram G K Bhat, Balakrishna Nallabolu, Sreedhish K, Bharath Krishna S, Sharan S Patil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.057

Authors: Ravikumar Mukartihal [1], Rajdeep Das [1], Chandan S [1], Vikram G K Bhat [1], Balakrishna Nallabolu [1], Sreedhish K [1], Bharath Krishna S [1], Sharan S Patil [1]

[1] Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Sparsh Hospital for Advanced Surgeries, Bengaluru, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Ravikumar Mukartihal
Consultant Orthopaedic and Robotic Joint Replacement Surgeon, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Sparsh Hospital for Advanced Surgeries, Bengaluru, India.
E-mail: ravikumarmukartihal@gmail.com

Abstract

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a very impelling treatment for severe osteoarthritis. But, prosthesis longevity along with clinical and functional outcome of patients are intricately related to proper alignment and position of the prosthesis and how perfectly the artificial joint can mimic the native knee anatomy and kinematics. To minimize outliers and improve accuracy, precision and patients’ outcome, promising new technologies have been developed in knee arthroplasty. TKA is advancing by leaps and bounds with the advent and introduction and application of technologies in its domain. The aim of this article is to put up and brief about the technologies in TKA, their concepts, advantages, and limitations.
Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty, Knee arthroplasty, Total knee replacement, Osteoarthritis, Technology, Biomedical Technology, Robot-assisted surgery, Artificial intelligence, Augmented reality

References

1. Kayani B, Konan S, Ayuob A, Onochie E, Al-Jabri T, Haddad FS. Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Reviews. 2019 Oct 1;4(10):611-7.
2. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE. The Chetranjan Ranawat Award: Tibial Component Failure Mechanisms in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007). 2004 Nov 1;428:26-34.
3. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr RI, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar 1;60(2):217-20.
4. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007). 1994 Feb 1;299:31-43.
5. Dorr LD. CORR Insights®: does robotic-assisted TKA result in better outcome scores or long-term survivorship than conventional TKA? A randomized, controlled trial. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2020 Feb;478(2):276.
6. Waddell BS, Carroll K, Jerabek S. Technology in arthroplasty: are we improving value?. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2017 Sep;10(3):378-87.
7. Batailler C, Swan J, Sappey Marinier E, Servien E, Lustig S. New technologies in knee arthroplasty: current concepts. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020 Dec 25;10(1):47.
8. León-Muñoz VJ, Martínez-Martínez F, López-López M, Santonja- Medina F. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2019 Jul 3;16(7):555-67.
9. Frye BM, Najim AA, Adams JB, Berend KR, Lombardi Jr AV. MRI is more accurate than CT for patient-specific total knee arthroplasty. The knee. 2015 Dec 1;22(6):609-12.
10. Abdel MP, Parratte S, Blanc G, Ollivier M, Pomero V, Viehweger E, Argenson JN. No benefit of patient-specific instrumentation in TKA on functional and gait outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2014 Aug;472(8):2468-76.
11. Abane L, Anract P, Boisgard S, Descamps S, Courpied JP, Hamadouche M. A comparison of patient-specific and conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. The bone & joint journal. 2015 Jan;97(1):56-63.
12. Vundelinckx BJ, Bruckers L, De Mulder K, De Schepper J, Van Esbroeck G. Functional and radiographic short-term outcome evaluation of the Visionaire system, a patient-matched instrumentation system for total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2013 Jun 1;28(6):964-70.
13. Chen JY, Chin PL, Tay DK, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Functional outcome and quality of life after patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2015 Oct 1;30(10):1724-8.
14. Bonnin MP, Schmidt A, Basiglini L, Bossard N, Dantony E. Mediolateral oversizing influences pain, function, and flexion after TKA. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2013 Oct;21(10):2314-24.
15. Mahoney OM, Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. JBJS. 2010 May 1;92(5):1115-21.
16. Bonnin MP, Beckers L, Leon A, Chauveau J, Müller JH, Tibesku CO, Aït-Si-Selmi T. Custom total knee arthroplasty facilitates restoration of constitutional coronal alignment. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2020 Jul 17:1-2.
17. Arbab D, Reimann P, Brucker M, Bouillon B, Lüring C. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty—A comparison of patient-specific implants with the conventional technique. The Knee. 2018 Oct 1;25(5):882-7.
18. Levengood GA, Dupee J. Accuracy of coronal plane mechanical alignment in a customized, individually made total knee replacement with patient-specific instrumentation. The journal of knee surgery. 2018 Sep;31(08):792-6.
19. Schroeder L, Martin G. In vivo tibial fit and rotational analysis of a customized, patient-specific TKA versus off-the-shelf TKA. The Journal of Knee Surgery. 2019 Jun;32(06):499-505.
20. Reimann P, Brucker M, Arbab D, Lüring C. Patient satisfaction-A comparison between patient-specific implants and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedics. 2019 May 1;16(3):273-7.
21. Schwarzkopf R, Brodsky M, Garcia GA, Gomoll AH. Surgical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing total knee replacement with patient-specific implants compared with “off-the-shelf” implants. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. 2015 Jun 24;3(7):2325967115590379.
22. White PB, Ranawat AS. Patient-specific total knees demonstrate a higher manipulation rate compared to “off-the-shelf implants”. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2016 Jan 1;31(1):107-11.
23. Mihalko WM, Saleh KJ, Krackow KA, Whiteside LA. Soft-tissue balancing during total knee arthroplasty in the varus knee. JAAOSJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2009 Dec 1;17(12):766-74.
24. Nagai K, Muratsu H, Takeoka Y, Tsubosaka M, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T. The influence of joint distraction force on the soft tissue balance using modified gap-balancing technique in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct 1;32(10):2995-9.
25. Lee SY, Lim HC, Jang KM, Bae JH. What factors are associated with femoral component internal rotation in TKA using the gap balancing technique? Clinical Orthopaedics and RelatedResearch®. 2017 Aug;475(8):1999-2010.
26. Ferreira MC, Franciozi CE, Kubota MS, Priore RD, Ingham SJ,Abdalla RJ. Is the use of spreaders an accurate method for ligament balancing? The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul 1;32(7):2262-7.
27. Kim SH, Lim JW, Jung HJ, Lee HJ. Influence of soft tissue balancing and distal femoral resection on flexion contracture in navigated total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov;25(11):3501-7.
28. Heesterbeek PJ, Haffner N, Wymenga AB, Stifter J, Ritschl P. Patient-related factors influence stiffness of the soft tissue complex during intraoperative gap balancing in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017 Sep;25(9):2760-8.
29. Wyss TF, Schuster AJ, Münger P, Pfluger D, Wehrli U. Does total knee joint replacement with the soft tissue balancing surgical technique maintain the natural joint line? Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2006 Sep;126(7):480-6.
30. Elmallah RK, Mistry JB, Cherian JJ, Chughtai M, Bhave A, Roche MW, Mont MA. Can we really “feel” a balanced total knee arthroplasty? The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep 1;31(9):102-5.
31. Nodzo SR, Franceschini V, Della Valle AG. Intraoperative load sensing variability during cemented, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan 1;32(1):66-70.
32. Ghirardelli S, Bala A, Peretti G, Antonini G, Indelli PF. Intraoperative sensing technology to achieve balance in primary total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature. JBJS reviews. 2019 Oct 1;7(10):e4.
33. Iyengar KP, Gowers BT, Jain VK, Ahluwalia RS, Botchu R, Vaishya R. Smart sensor implant technology in total knee arthroplasty. Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. 2021 Nov 1;22:101605.
34. Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, Elson LC, Anderson CR. A new method for defining balance: promising short-term clinical outcomes of sensor-guided TKA. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2014 May 1;29(5):955-60.
35. Chow JC, Breslauer L. The use of intraoperative sensors significantly increases the patient-reported rate of improvement in primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2017 Jul 1;40(4):e648-51.
36. Geller JA, Lakra A, Murtaugh T. The use of electronic sensor device to augment ligament balancing leads to a lower rate of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017 May 1;32(5):1502-4.
37. Lee DH, Park JH, Song DI, Padhy D, Jeong WK, Han SB. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: comparison between navigation assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2010 Mar;18(3):381- 7.
38. Rhee SJ, Kim HJ, Lee CR, Kim CW, Gwak HC, Kim JH. A comparison of long-term outcomes of computer-navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JBJS. 2019 Oct 16;101(20):1875-85.
39. Ek ET, Dowsey MM, Tse LF, Riazi A, Love BR, Stoney JD, Choong PF. Comparison of functional and radiological outcomes after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a matched-control retrospective study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2008 Aug;16(2):192-6.
40. Jones CW, Jerabek SA. Current role of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1989-93.
41. Budhiparama NC, Lumban-Gaol I, Ifran NN, Parratte S, Nelissen R. Does accelerometer-based navigation have any clinical benefit compared with conventional TKA? A systematic review. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2019 Sep;477(9):2017.
42. Camarda L, D’Arienzo A, Morello S, Peri G, Valentino B, D’Arienzo M. Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a literature review. Musculoskeletal surgery. 2015 Apr;99(1):11-8.
43. Banerjee S, Cherian JJ, Elmallah RK, Pierce TP, Jauregui JJ, Mont MA. Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty. Expert review of medical devices. 2016 Jan 2;13(1):47-56.
44. Chen X, Deng S, Sun ML, He R. Robotic arm-assisted arthroplasty: The latest developments. Chinese Journal of Traumatology. 2022 May 1;25(3):125-31.
45. Jacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2016 Oct 1;31(10):2353-63.
46. Bagaria V, Sadigale OS, Pawar PP, Bashyal RK, Achalare A, Poduval M. Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty (RAKA): the technique, the technology and the transition. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2020 Nov;54(6):745-56.
47. Ponzio DY, Lonner JH. Preoperative mapping in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using computed tomography scans is associated with radiation exposure and carries a high cost. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2015 Jun 1;30(6):964-7.
48. Kayani B, Konan S, Huq SS, Tahmassebi J, Haddad FS. Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for the accuracy of implant positioning. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2019 Apr;27(4):1132-41.
49. Sultan AA, Samuel LT, Khlopas A, Sodhi N, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Chen A, Orozco F, Kolisek F, Mahoney O, Smith L, Malkani A. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty more accurately restored the posterior condylar offset ratio and the Insall-Salvati Index compared to the manual technique; a cohort-matched study. Surg Technol Int. 2019 May 1;34(409):e13.
50. Liow MH, Xia Z, Wong MK, Tay KJ, Yeo SJ, Chin PL. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2014 Dec 1;29(12):2373-7.
51. Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Hampp EL, Scholl LY, Prieto M, Chang TC, Abbasi A, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Otto J, Jacofsky DJ, Mont MA. Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Soft Tissue Protection. Surgical technology international. 2017 Jul 1;30:441-6.
52. Abdel MP, Ledford CK, Kobic A, Taunton MJ, Hanssen AD. Contemporary failure aetiologies of the primary, posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2017 May;99(5):647-52.
53. Kutzner I, Bender A, Dymke J, Duda G, Von Roth P, Bergmann G. Mediolateral force distribution at the knee joint shifts across activities and is driven by tibiofemoral alignment. The bone & joint journal. 2017 Jun;99(6):779-87.
54. Haddad FS. Evolving techniques: the need for better technology.
The Bone & Joint Journal. 2017 Feb;99(2):145-6.
55. Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. The Knee. 2002 Sep 1;9(3):173-80.
56. Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Rowan FE, Haddad FS. An assessment of early functional rehabilitation and hospital discharge in conventional versus robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J. 2019 Jan;101(1):24-33.
57. Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Netravali NA, Bargar WL. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2013 Jan;471(1):118-26.
58. Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Jung WB, Park HW, Lee GW. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2011 Jul;19(7):1069- 76.
59. Liow MH, Goh GS, Wong MK, Chin PL, Tay DK, Yeo SJ. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality of- life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017 Sep;25(9):2942-51.
60. Yang HY, Seon JK, Shin YJ, Lim HA, Song EK. Robotic total knee arthroplasty with a cruciate-retaining implant: a 10-year follow-up study. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery. 2017 Jun 1;9(2):169-76.
61. Cho KJ, Seon JK, Jang WY, et al. Robotic versus conventional primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological long-term results with a minimum follow-up of ten years. Int Orthop 2019. Jun;43(6):1345-1354.
62. Cotter EJ, Wang J, Illgen RL. Comparative cost analysis of robotic-assisted and jig-based manual primary total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Knee Surgery. 2022 Jan;35(02):176-84.
63. Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today—has anything changed after 10 years?. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2014 Sep 1;29(9):1774-8.
64. Blyth M, Jones B, MacLean A, Rowe P. Two-year results of a randomized trial of robotic surgical assistance vs manual unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. InAnnual Meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons 2017 Nov.
65. Pearle AD, van der List JP, Lee L, Coon TM, Borus TA, Roche MW. Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up. The Knee. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):419-28.
66. Pastides P, Nathwani D. The role of newer technologies in knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2017 Feb 1;31(1):47-52.
67. Bellman R. An introduction to artificial intelligence: can computers think?. Thomson Course Technology; 1978.
68. Ahuja AS. The impact of artificial intelligence in medicine on the future role of the physician. PeerJ. 2019 Oct 4;7:e7702.
69. Myers TG, Ramkumar PN, Ricciardi BF, Urish KL, Kipper J, Ketonis C. Artificial intelligence and orthopaedics: an introduction for clinicians. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2020 May 6;102(9):830.
70. Batailler C, Shatrov J, Sappey-Marinier E, Servien E, Parratte S, Lustig S. Artificial intelligence in knee arthroplasty: the current concept of the available clinical applications. Arthroplasty. 2022 Dec;4(1):1-6.
71. Purnomo G, Yeo SJ, Liow MH. Artificial intelligence in arthroplasty. Arthroplasty. 2021 Dec;3(1):1-7.
72. Noonan VK, Lyddiatt A, Ware P, Jaglal SB, Riopelle RJ, Bingham III CO, Figueiredo S, Sawatzky R, Santana M, Bartlett SJ, Ahmed S. Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series–Paper 3: patient-reported outcomes can facilitate shared decision-making and guide self-management. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2017 Sep 1;89:125-35.
73. Paul HY, Wei J, Kim TK, Sair HI, Hui FK, Hager GD, Fritz J, Oni JK. Automated detection & classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning. The Knee. 2020 Mar 1;27(2):535-42.
74. Shah RF, Bini SA, Martinez AM, Pedoia V, Vail TP. Incremental inputs improve the automated detection of implant loosening using machine-learning algorithms. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2020 Jun;102(6 Supple A):101-6.
75. Kazarian GS, Lawrie CM, Barrack TN, Donaldson MJ, Miller GM, Haddad FS, Barrack RL. The impact of surgeon volume and training status on implant alignment in total knee arthroplasty. JBJS. 2019 Oct 2;101(19):1713-23.
76. Goh GS, Lohre R, Parvizi J, Goel DP. Virtual and augmented reality for surgical training and simulation in knee arthroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2021 Dec;141(12):2303-12.
77. Chand M, Ramachandran N, Stoyanov D, Lovat L. Robotics, artificial intelligence and distributed ledgers in surgery: data is key!. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2018 Sep;22(9):645-8.
78. Zhou XY, Guo Y, Shen M, Yang GZ. Application of artificial intelligence in surgery. Frontiers of medicine. 2020 Aug;14(4):417- 30.
79. Panesar S, Cagle Y, Chander D, Morey J, Fernandez-Miranda J, Kliot M. Artificial intelligence and the future of surgical robotics. Annals of surgery. 2019 Aug 1;270(2):223-6.
80. Chiang CY, Chen KH, Liu KC, Hsu SJ, Chan CT. Data collection and analysis using wearable sensors for monitoring knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Sensors. 2017 Feb 22;17(2):418.
81. Kang K, Geng Q, Xu HT, Zheng XZ, Dong JT, Li T, Zhao ZG, Gao SJ. Clinical study of a new wearable device for rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi. 2018 Apr 1;98(15):1162-5.
82. Kline PW, Melanson EL, Sullivan WJ, Blatchford PJ, Miller MJ, Stevens-Lapsley JE, Christiansen CL. Improving physical activity through adjunct telerehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty: randomized controlled trial protocol. Physical therapy. 2019 Jan 1;99(1):37-45.
83. Wang S, Summers RM. Machine learning and radiology. Medical image analysis. 2012 Jul 1;16(5):933-51.
84. Deo RC. Machine learning in medicine. Circulation. 2015 Nov 17;132(20):1920-30.
85. Azuma RT. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: teleoperators & virtual environments. 1997 Aug 1;6(4):355-85.
86. Vávra P, Roman J, Zonča P, Ihnát P, Němec M, Kumar J, Habib N, El-Gendi A. Recent development of augmented reality in surgery: a review. Journal of healthcare engineering. 2017 Aug 21;2017.
87. Chytas D, Malahias MA, Nikolaou VS. Augmented reality in orthopaedics: current state and future directions. Frontiers in Surgery. 2019 Jun 27;6:38.
88. Nikou C, Digioia III AM, Blackwell M, Jaramaz B, Kanade T. Augmented reality imaging technology for orthopaedic surgery. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2000 Jan 1;10(1):82-6.
89. Blackwell M, Morgan F, DiGioia III AM. Augmented reality and its future in orthopaedics. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007). 1998 Sep 1;354:111-22.
90. Navab N, Heining SM, Traub J. Camera augmented mobile C-arm (CAMC): calibration, accuracy study, and clinical applications. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 2009 May 26;29(7):1412- 23.
91. Fallavollita P, Wang L, Weidert S, Navab N. Augmented reality in orthopaedic interventions and education. InComputational radiology for orthopaedic interventions 2016 (pp. 251-269). Springer, Cham.
92. Fallavollita P, Brand A, Wang L, Euler E, Thaller P, Navab N, Weidert S. An augmented reality C-arm for intraoperative assessment of the mechanical axis: a preclinical study. International Journal of computer-assisted radiology and surgery. 2016 Nov;11(11):2111-7.
93. Pokhrel S, Alsadoon A, Prasad PW, Paul M. A novel augmented reality (AR) scheme for knee replacement surgery by considering cutting error accuracy. The international journal of medical robotics and computer-assisted surgery. 2019 Feb;15(1):e1958.
94. Pokhrel S, Alsadoon A, Prasad PW, Paul M. A novel augmented reality (AR) scheme for knee replacement surgery by considering cutting error accuracy. The international journal of medical robotics and computer-assisted surgery. 2019 Feb;15(1):e1958.
95. Gerrand C. CORR Insights®: can augmented reality be helpful in pelvic bone cancer surgery? An in vitro study. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2018 Sep;476(9):1726.

How to Cite this article:  Mukartihal R, Das R, Chandan S, Bhat VGK, Nallabolu B, Sreedhish K, Bharath K S, Patil SS | Technologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty| Journal of Karnataka Orthopaedic Association | January-February 2023; 11(1): 05-12. https://doi.org/10.13107/jkoa.2023.v11i01.057

 

                                          (Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)