Volume 8 | Issue 1 | Jan – Feb 2020 | Page: 14-17 | Sagar Venkataraman, Prabhu Ethiraj, Arun Heddur Shanthappa Naik, Sandesh Agarawal
Authors: Sagar Venkataraman , Prabhu Ethiraj , Arun Heddur Shanthappa Naik , Sandesh Agarawal .
 Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research (SDUAHER) Tamaka, Kolar Karnataka INDIA.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Prabhu Ethiraj
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research (SDUAHER) Tamaka, Kolar Karnataka INDIA.
Background: Medial malleolus fracture is commonly seen nowadays in orthopaedic practice. There are different modalities of treatment based on fracture pattern, socio-economic status. Undisplaced fracture can be managed by cast application. Various surgical modalities of treatment are available in treating medial malleolus fracture like tension band wiring, cancellous screw or cortical screw fixation, plate fixation, k-wire, suture anchors. The purpose of our study was to evaluate and compare radiological outcome of medial malleolar fracture managed with tension band wiring and cancellous screw fixation.
Materials and Methods: Our study included 53 patients who met inclusion criteria and were divided into two groups. 25 patients with bimalleolar fractures cases were included in group 1 and treated with open reduction and tension band wiring (TBW) for medial malleolus fracture. Other 28 patients in group 2 were treated by open reduction/closed reduction with cannulated cancellous screw for medial malleolus fracture. In all the cases lateral malleolus was fixed and common factor in both the group. All post op patients were evaluated at 1st month, 2nd month, 3rd month, 6th month and 1 year. We evaluated patient clinically and radiological union of fractures.
Results: In our study out of 53 patients there was male preponderance and average age was 42.07 years. Right side fractures were more compared to left side fractures. Most common mode of injury was road traffic accident. Average union time in group 1 is 14.4 weeks and group 2 is 12.6 weeks. Fracture union was 100% in group 1 and in group 2 was 96.66%. All the data from the study was evaluated by Fischer exact test with P value calculated for union rates between two groups patient treated with Tension Band Wiring Vs Cannulated cancellous screw. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conclusion: In our study average union time in patients treated with cancellous screw fixation was early compared to patients treated with tension band wiring group. In cancellous screw fixation group required additional stability in the form additional k-wire or second cancellous screw with ankle joint immobilization.
Key words: Medial malleolus, Tension Band Wiring (TBW), Cancellous screw.
1.Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S et al. Epidemiology of osteoporotic ankle fractures in elderly persons in Finland. Ann Intern Med 1996;125 (12): 975-8.
2.Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G. Adult ankle fractures: an increasing problem. ActaOrthopScand 1998;69:43-7
3.Hughes JL, Weber H, Willenegger H. Evaluation of ankle fractures: nonoperative and operative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; 138: 111
4. Herscovici D Jr, Scaduto JM, Infante A. Conservative treatment of isolated fractures of medial malleolus. J Bone Joint Surg Br ;2007;89(1):89-93.
5.Ostrum RF, Litsky AS. Tension band fixation of medial malleolus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1992; 6(4):464-8.
6. Georgiadis GM, White DB. Modified tension band wiring of medial malleolar ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. ;1995:16(2):64-8.
7. Ruedi TP, Moran CG, Buckley R. AO Principles of Fracture Management. 2nd edition. Thieme Publishing Group, New York 2007
8. Toolan BC, Koval KJ, Kummer FJ, Sanders R, Zuckerman JD. Vertical shear fractures of the medial malleolus: a biochemical study of five internal fixation techniques. Foot Ankle Int;1994;15(9):483-9.
9. Wegner AM, Wolinsky PR, Robbins MA, Garcia TC, Maitra S, Amanatullah DF. Antiglide plating of vertical medial malleolus fractures provides stiffer initial fixation than bicortical or unicortical screw fixation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon);2016;31(1):29-32.
10. David T, Loveday, Angus Arthur and Graham M. Tytherleigh-Strong. Technical Tip: Fixation of Medial Malleolar Fractures using a suture anchor. Foot Ankle Int; 2009;30(1):68.
11.Nurul SK, Shahidi P. Comparative study of malleolar fractures by tension band and malleolar screw. J Ortho Trauma 1998;12(1):13-9.
12.Mack D, Szabo RM. Complications of tension-band wiring. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;67:1936-1941.
13. Kim SK, et al. One or two lag screws for fixation of Denis- Weber type B fractures of the ankle. J Trauma. 2005;46(6):1039-1044.
14.Savage T, McGarry J, Stone PA. The internal fixation of ankle fracture. Clin Podiatr Med Surg.2009;12:603-631
15.Jones PS. Single screw used for medial malleolar ankle fractures. AAOS On-line Service Academy News- Section B. Today’s News. February 15, 1997.
|How to Cite this article: Venkataraman S, Ethiraj P, Naik A, Agarawal S | Medial malleolus fracture management- A comparative study between tension band wiring and cancellous screw fixation. | Journal Of Karnataka Orthopaedic Association | Jan-Feb 2020; 8(1): 14-17.|